Terms describing how scientific studies are designed and conducted.
RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial)The gold standard for clinical research. Participants are randomly assigned to either the treatment group or control group. Randomization helps eliminate bias and ensures any differences in outcomes are due to the treatment being studied rather than other factors.Meta-analysisA statistical method that combines results from multiple independent studies to provide a more precise estimate of an effect. Meta-analyses increase statistical power and can detect effects that individual studies might miss.Systematic ReviewA comprehensive review that identifies, evaluates, and synthesizes all relevant studies on a specific question. Unlike narrative reviews, systematic reviews follow a rigorous, predefined methodology to minimize bias.Double-blind StudyA study design where neither the participants nor the researchers know who is receiving the treatment versus the placebo. This prevents both groups' expectations from influencing the results.Placebo-controlledA study design where the control group receives an inactive substance (placebo) that looks identical to the treatment. This helps determine whether observed effects are due to the treatment itself or psychological factors.Cohort StudyAn observational study that follows a group of people over time to see how certain factors affect health outcomes. Unlike RCTs, researchers observe but don't intervene, making them useful when randomization isn't ethical or practical.Case StudyAn in-depth examination of a single individual or small group. While case studies can generate hypotheses, they cannot establish causation and are considered weak evidence compared to controlled trials.